Differences in One?s Own and One?s Partner?s Perceptions of Social Skills as a Function of Attachment Style :: essays research papers

Differences in Ones Own and Ones Partners Perceptions of amicable Skills as a Function of Attachment StyleResearchers / Experimenters Laura K. Guerrero and Susanne M. Jones Goal or Purpose of the Study To extend research and theory on the relations mingled with affixation agency and fond skillTo gain a clearer picture of how the intersection of models of self and others associates with different social skills by testing for supplement-style differences across Bartholomews four-category conceptuality of attachment Guide Questions Are there differences in attachment style that relate to how people recognize their own social skills, specifically in turned on(p) expressivity, emotional control, emotional sensitivity, social expressivity, social control, and social sensitivity?Do people recognize their partners social skills (emotional expressivity, emotional control, emotional sensitivity, social expressivity, social control, and social sensitivity) differently as a function of their partners self-reported attachment styles?Theories or Models ATTACHMENT THEORYAttachment theory provides a useful framework for examine differences in social skills. This theory states that people develop different attachment styles as a result of interactions with significant others, beginning with their interactions with a primary conferrer which was utter to be the parents of a certain child (Bowlby, 1969).Attachment styles are modes of social interaction that reflect how people view themselves and others (Bartholomew, 1990). Bartholomews (1990, 1993) conceptualization of attachment style entails crossing two theoretically-derived dimensions a mental mode of self (based on whether a person has an internalized sense of self-worth) and a mental model of others (based on whether a person intoxicates involvement with others to be rewarding). When these dimensions are crossed, four unique attachment styles emerge secure (positive models of both self and others), dismissive (p ositive model of self, ostracize of others), tremendous (negative models of both self and others), and preoccupied (negative model of self, positive model of others).Secure individuals are confident that others will like and accept them. They are too well-heeled with fuddledness and attend relatively few interpersonal problems. Dismissive individuals are confident and self-sufficient, but to the point that they often reject interaction with others, and see relationships as both unrewarding and unnecessary. These individuals usually place a premium on activities related to work or self-fulfillment rather than on close relationships with others. In contrast, fearful individuals would like to have close relationships with others, but they worry that they will be rejected or hurt. These individuals generally have low self-confidence and experience considerable social anxiety when interacting with others.Differences in One?s Own and One?s Partner?s Perceptions of Social Skills as a Function of Attachment Style essays research papers Differences in Ones Own and Ones Partners Perceptions of Social Skills as a Function of Attachment StyleResearchers / Experimenters Laura K. Guerrero and Susanne M. Jones Goal or Purpose of the Study To extend research and theory on the relations between attachment style and social skillTo gain a clearer picture of how the intersection of models of self and others associates with different social skills by testing for attachment-style differences across Bartholomews four-category conceptualization of attachment Guide Questions Are there differences in attachment style that relate to how people recognize their own social skills, specifically in emotional expressivity, emotional control, emotional sensitivity, social expressivity, social control, and social sensitivity?Do people recognize their partners social skills (emotional expressivity, emotional control, emotional sensitivity, social expressivity, social control, and socia l sensitivity) differently as a function of their partners self-reported attachment styles?Theories or Models ATTACHMENT THEORYAttachment theory provides a useful framework for studying differences in social skills. This theory states that people develop different attachment styles as a result of interactions with significant others, beginning with their interactions with a primary giver which was said to be the parents of a certain child (Bowlby, 1969).Attachment styles are modes of social interaction that reflect how people view themselves and others (Bartholomew, 1990). Bartholomews (1990, 1993) conceptualization of attachment style entails crossing two theoretically-derived dimensions a mental mode of self (based on whether a person has an internalized sense of self-worth) and a mental model of others (based on whether a person sees involvement with others to be rewarding). When these dimensions are crossed, four unique attachment styles emerge secure (positive models of both se lf and others), dismissive (positive model of self, negative of others), fearful (negative models of both self and others), and preoccupied (negative model of self, positive model of others).Secure individuals are confident that others will like and accept them. They are also comfortable with closeness and experience relatively few interpersonal problems. Dismissive individuals are confident and self-sufficient, but to the point that they often reject interaction with others, and see relationships as both unrewarding and unnecessary. These individuals usually place a premium on activities related to work or self-fulfillment rather than on close relationships with others. In contrast, fearful individuals would like to have close relationships with others, but they worry that they will be rejected or hurt. These individuals generally have low self-esteem and experience considerable social anxiety when interacting with others.